Yet now I am drawn into “Talk,” in spite of my reluctance. The topic
itself – courage – draws me in, and the respect with which the poet holds it. I
have great admiration for risk-takers, mainly because, like Yevtushenko,
“courage has never been my quality.” Mine is a low-risk personality, taking on
what may look occasionally like a brave act out of sheer necessity to meet
basic responsibilities. I am not the one who runs into a burning building to
save a life. I’m the one who dials 9-1-1.
Such bravery astounds and
mystifies me. I study what I can of courage, thinking one day I may learn what
it takes to run in, not just dial out.
So I read Yevtushenko’s “Talk” as
he tells us a few things about courage by saying what it is not:
1. A courageous act
causes foundations to tremble. “No
foundations trembled.”
A true act of
bravery makes a real and lasting impact. It’s
not extreme sport for the sake of adrenaline high. Courage is a game-changer.
2. Bravery requires
an element of danger. “I did no more than write, never denounced” Denunciation implies
risk. Yevtushenko was writing in the context of a totalitarian society in which
denouncing someone in power was guaranteeing great risk to self. Bravery is
dangerous.
3. Courage is art,
not a job description. “(doing what anyhow had to be done)”
Yevtushenko
says here that he did his job as a writer – he called 9-1-1 – nothing more,
nothing less. Courage moves beyond the basic job description. As Seth Godin
said (in Linchpin), “The job is what
you do when you are told what to do… Your art is what you do when no one
can tell you exactly how to do it. Your art is the act of taking personal
responsibility, challenging the status quo, and changing people.”
4. Bravery goes past
basic human decency to self-sacrifice. “…common integrity could look like courage.”
The last line
of this poem comes with a sting to the reader. The poet is basically saying,
“If this looks like courage to you, you should get your moral glasses checked.”
Kind of harsh, but wake-up calls can feel that way. Honesty and integrity feed
the soul, sustain the self. They are good and necessary. But bravery launches
itself from this strong foundation and offers self as sacrifice for a greater
good, for another. Courage gives it all away.
While Yevtushenko may have been more concerned about
politics, I would argue that bravery of this sort is a very personal and
individualized thing. What represents risk to one person may prove as
undaunting as falling out of bed to another. Traveling to the heart of India
might not require courage from a regular world traveler, but for someone
suffering agoraphobia, walking out the front door poses a very real and present
danger demanding extreme bravery.
At times, the most foundation-shaking acts occur in moments
of quiet courage between two people. For some those might be the “I’m sorry”
moments, the “you were right” admissions, that cost everything for the teller and
turn worlds upside down. Or right side up.
I believe we all have it in us to rise to this level of
courage. I believe it is part of our wiring, the stamp of a self-sacrificing
foundation-shaking Creator. Most of the time, though, we forget about the
Creator’s watermark. Most days we do our job and call 9-1-1 and tell almost all
of the truth. Most days we stand fairly steady on unmoving floors.
Most days we are so busy meeting our responsibilities that
we forget to look in the mirror. We forget our wiring. Until we have to
remember. Until someone else helps us remember.
I would like to remember and reclaim courage as my own
quality. Maybe instead of carrying contempt for ourselves, like Yevtushenko, we
can help each other be brave. What do you say?
No comments:
Post a Comment